Compare · Reveal

Reveal alternative for account mapping: what to use now that Reveal has merged into Crossbeam and the platform is gone

If you searched for Reveal, you searched for a product that no longer runs. Crossbeam acquired Reveal, the combined company kept the Crossbeam name, and Crossbeam's own sunset page now states that the Reveal platform and website are no longer available. We checked reveal.co on September 2, 2026 and it does not resolve to a working site.

That matters more than a normal vendor comparison, because Reveal was the option a lot of teams reached for when they wanted account mapping without a budget conversation. The question is no longer which of two account mapping networks to pick. It is what to do now that the two largest networks are one company, and what the remaining choices actually cost.

This page lays out the alternatives that still exist, what each one publishes, and the one structural fact that decides most of these evaluations: in account mapping, price transparency and limit transparency are inversely distributed. The vendor that shows you a price meters the product hardest. The vendor that promises unlimited everything will not show you a price.

or see the comparison ↓

Ranked by fit · outreach you approve · no marketplace tax

Partner Desk

You approve before anything sends

Try

Describe your product, find your partners

Partnerships surfaces the companies who should resell, refer, and integrate with you, ranked by a transparent fit score, then drafts the outreach for you to approve.

You fit Partner

↑ pick a product and hit Find partners

Ideal partners for

ranked by fit

Drafted outreach · Drafted outreach

Writing

Click a match to draft a first-touch message in your voice.

Sent

A human approves every outreach before it sends. Nothing goes out automatically.

Partner pipeline

Co-sell revenue

One co-sell overlap surfaced from account mapping. Referral and co-sell revenue tracked per partner.

Live, interactive · ranked by transparent fit

Ranked by transparent fit · you approve every outreach · no marketplace tax · you own your partner list

Move to Crossbeam if your partners are already on the combined network and you want the largest overlap pool, and accept that the meters are on seats, record exports and open data partners. Look at PartnerTap if you want unlimited users and partners and are willing to run a sales process to find out what that costs. Look at WorkSpan if your partnerships are cloud marketplace and global systems integrator alliances rather than a software channel. Look at Partnerships if account mapping is one stage of a program you also have to recruit, onboard and pay for, and you want the whole price published before you talk to anyone.

The short answer

What is the best Reveal alternative in 2026?

Reveal is not a separate product any more. Crossbeam acquired it, the combined company kept the Crossbeam name, and Crossbeam's own notice states that as of June 1st the Reveal platform and website are no longer available. So the real shortlist is Crossbeam itself, PartnerTap, WorkSpan for enterprise co-sell, or a partner platform that treats account mapping as one stage rather than the whole product. Crossbeam is the only one of them that publishes a dollar figure.

Last updated September 2026 · pricing re-verified on each vendor's own pricing page

Reveal at a glance

Is Reveal still available: No. Crossbeam's sunset notice states "As of June 1st, the Reveal platform and website are no longer available" and that "Reveal has officially joined forces with Crossbeam". We checked reveal.co on September 2, 2026 and it returns an HTTP 522 error with no working site behind it
Who owns Reveal now: Crossbeam. The merger was announced in 2024 and the announcement states "The combined company will bear the name Crossbeam"
How big the combined network is: Crossbeam's announcement states "By 2024, more than 25,000 companies had adopted either Crossbeam or Reveal to automate account mapping, share CRM data across their partner ecosystems"
Crossbeam published pricing: Free at $0 forever with no credit card. Connector at $4,800 a year with extra seats at $1,800 per user per year. Supernode and Enterprise are custom, with sales seats at $40 per user per month
PartnerTap published pricing: No dollar figure. Four editions named Free, Growth, Scale Up and Hyperscale, all quoted through sales
WorkSpan published pricing: No dollar figure and no named tiers. The pricing page routes to a demo booking
The transparency inversion: Crossbeam publishes its price and meters the product in detail. PartnerTap publishes the meters, stating unlimited users, partners and data on paid editions, and publishes no price. You cannot get both numbers from either one
What a Reveal free user gets on Crossbeam free: Three full access seats, unlimited partner connections, but one offline partner, one open data partner, no record exports and no custom populations
Partnerships pricing: $79, $199 and $449 a month, flat and published, with no percentage of partner revenue

Side by side

Reveal vs Partnerships, honestly

A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.

What matters	Partnerships	Reveal
Does the product still exist	Yes, and pricing is published in full	Reveal does not. Crossbeam states the Reveal platform and website are no longer available
Published pricing	Yes. $79, $199 and $449 a month	Crossbeam publishes $0 free and $4,800 a year for Connector. PartnerTap and WorkSpan publish no figure
Free tier	No free tier, but the price is published	Crossbeam free is $0 forever with 3 seats. PartnerTap free covers up to 5 partners and 5 pipeline shares
What the price meters	Flat plan, no per-partner fee	Crossbeam meters seats, record exports and open data partners. PartnerTap states unlimited on paid editions but quotes privately
Seats included	Included on every published plan	Crossbeam Connector includes 1 full access seat at $4,800 a year, with more at $1,800 each
Supplies new partner companies	Yes. AI discovery surfaces reseller, affiliate, integration and co-marketing candidates ranked by transparent fit	None of them. Account mapping compares you against partners you already have
Runs the rest of the lifecycle	Yes. Recruiting, onboarding, deal registration and revenue on one record	Crossbeam and PartnerTap are overlap and co-sell tools. WorkSpan adds alliance and marketplace workflow
How you buy	Pricing published in full before any call	Crossbeam self-serve up to Connector. PartnerTap and WorkSpan require a sales conversation

Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.

Verified figures

The account mapping options that still exist, side by side

Every figure below was read off the vendor's own site on September 2, 2026. Where a row says no published price, that vendor genuinely publishes none. We have not copied estimates from software directories.

	Crossbeam (absorbed Reveal)	PartnerTap	WorkSpan	Partnerships
What it is	Account mapping and ecosystem data network, now holding both former user bases	Account mapping and co-selling platform	Alliance, cloud marketplace and co-sell management	AI partner discovery plus program management
Published price	Yes. $0 free, $4,800 a year Connector	None. Four editions, all quoted	None. Demo booking only	$79, $199 and $449 a month
Tier names	Free, Connector, Supernode, Enterprise	Free, Growth, Scale Up, Hyperscale	None published	Three published plans
Free tier	Yes. $0 forever, no credit card	Yes. Up to 5 partners and 5 pipeline shares	Not published	No
Seats on the entry paid plan	1 full access seat included, extra seats $1,800 per user per year	Paid editions state unlimited users	Not published	Included on every plan
Partner limits	Unlimited partner connections on every tier, but offline and open data partners are metered	Paid editions state unlimited partners	Not published	No per-partner fee
Record exports	None on free, 5,000 on Connector, 25,000 on Supernode, 100,000 on Enterprise	Paid editions state unlimited report downloads	Not published	Exportable partner record
Sales seats	$40 per user per month on Supernode and Enterprise	Included in the edition	Not published	Included
Finds new partner companies	No	No	No	Yes, ranked by transparent fit score
Best fit	Teams whose partners are already on the combined network	Teams that want no user or partner caps and will run a sales process	Cloud marketplace and global systems integrator alliances	Programs that need recruiting and lifecycle, not only overlap

Why teams pick Partnerships

AI prospecting and drafted outreach, with no marketplace tax

What actually happened to Reveal, and why it changes the shortlist

Crossbeam and Reveal were the two large account mapping networks. They merged, and Crossbeam's own announcement is unambiguous about the outcome: "The combined company will bear the name Crossbeam." The announcement also puts a number on the combined footprint, stating that "By 2024, more than 25,000 companies had adopted either Crossbeam or Reveal to automate account mapping, share CRM data across their partner ecosystems, and supercharge their go-to-market teams with partner data and relationships." The transition ran for a while in parallel. The merger FAQ published at the time said "In the near term, both products will continue to exist and function as always" and that the company would "gradually support transitioning users (and their partners) over time." That period is over. Crossbeam's sunset page now states "As of June 1st, the Reveal platform and website are no longer available" and that "Reveal has officially joined forces with Crossbeam." We checked reveal.co on September 2, 2026 and the domain returns an HTTP 522 error rather than a product. The practical consequence is the part most comparison articles still get wrong. Account mapping is a network product: its value is how many of your partners are already in it. When the two largest networks became one, the usual reason to pick a challenger, that your partners happened to be on the other network, mostly evaporated. What is left is a single dominant pool and a set of alternatives that compete on price model, on unlimited access, or on covering more of the program than overlap alone.

The transparency inversion, and why you cannot get both numbers

Read the three pricing pages next to each other and a pattern falls out that is more useful than any feature list. Crossbeam publishes real dollars. Free is "$0/ forever" with no credit card. Connector is "$4,800/ year" as a platform fee, with additional seats at "$1,800/user/yr". Supernode and Enterprise are custom, though both list sales seats at "$40/user/mo". Crossbeam also publishes its meters in unusual detail: record exports run None, 5,000, 25,000 and 100,000 across the four tiers; custom populations run none, up to 3, unlimited and unlimited; open data partners run 1, 1, 3 and 10. Partner connections are unlimited on every tier, which is the network effect they want you to feel. PartnerTap does the opposite. It publishes four editions, Free, Growth, Scale Up and Hyperscale, and states that paid editions carry "UNLIMITED USERS, UNLIMITED PARTNERS, UNLIMITED DATA, and UNLIMITED REPORT DOWNLOADS." The free edition is bounded at up to 5 partners and up to 5 pipeline shares. What PartnerTap does not publish is a price. Every edition routes to sales. WorkSpan publishes neither. There are no tiers and no figures on its pricing page, only a demo booking, which is normal for a product sold into cloud marketplace and global systems integrator alliances where the deal is shaped per customer. So the inversion is this: in account mapping, price transparency and limit transparency are inversely distributed. The vendor that shows you what it costs meters the product hardest and tells you exactly where the meters sit. The vendor that promises unlimited everything will not tell you what unlimited costs. No vendor in this category currently gives a buyer both numbers, which is why a spreadsheet comparison built only from public pages will always have a hole in it.

What a former Reveal user should check before defaulting to Crossbeam

Defaulting to Crossbeam is a defensible choice, because that is where the network went. It is still worth checking four things rather than assuming continuity. Check the seat maths first, because it is where the cost usually lands. Crossbeam Connector is $4,800 a year and includes one full access seat. Additional full access seats are $1,800 per user per year. A partnerships team of three on Connector is $4,800 plus two more seats, so $8,400 a year before anyone in sales touches it. Sales seats on the higher tiers are separately priced at $40 per user per month. If your model assumed a team-wide tool, price the team, not the license. Check record exports against how you actually work. If your partner analysis happens in a spreadsheet or a warehouse rather than in the tool, the export cap is your real limit. Connector allows 5,000 records. That is a ceiling on the workflow, not on the data you can see. Check open data partners. Crossbeam allows 1 on Free and Connector, 3 on Supernode and 10 on Enterprise. Offline partners are unlimited from Connector up but capped at 1 on Free. If a chunk of your ecosystem is not on the network, that shapes which tier works. Check whether overlap is the actual bottleneck. This is the uncomfortable one. Account mapping tells you which of your customers a partner already sells to. It is genuinely valuable when you have partners worth mapping against. Plenty of programs buy it while their real constraint is that they have twelve partners and needed sixty, and no amount of overlap data fixes a thin partner list. If that describes your program, the spend belongs earlier in the funnel.

When account mapping should be a feature rather than the product

Overlap data is a stage, not a program. A partner has to be found, recruited, onboarded, given something to sell, and paid, and the deal they source has to be registered before it closes or the revenue is not defensible in a quarterly review. Account mapping sits in the middle of that sequence and answers exactly one question well. Buying it as a standalone product makes sense when overlap really is your constraint, typically once you have enough partners that manually comparing customer lists has stopped scaling, and when your partners are already on the same network. Below that threshold, a dedicated overlap network is a tool bought ahead of the problem it solves. The alternative shape is a platform where mapping is one stage among several. That is where Partnerships sits. The discovery agent researches partner companies against your ideal partner profile and returns them ranked by a transparent fit score with the reasoning shown, drafts recruiting outreach a person approves before it sends, and then carries the partners who say yes through onboarding, deal registration and revenue tracking on the same record. Pricing is $79, $199 and $449 a month, flat and published, with no percentage of partner revenue, so the platform does not get more expensive because your partners got better at selling. That is a different purchase from Crossbeam, and it is worth being honest about the tradeoff. If you have a mature ecosystem and need the deepest possible overlap data against thousands of counterparties, the network is the point and the network is at Crossbeam. If your program is earlier and the missing piece is partners rather than data about partners, the sequence matters more than the overlap.

Good questions

Reveal vs Partnerships, answered

No. Crossbeam acquired Reveal and the platform has been switched off. Crossbeam's sunset page states "As of June 1st, the Reveal platform and website are no longer available" and that "Reveal has officially joined forces with Crossbeam." We checked reveal.co on September 2, 2026 and it returns an HTTP 522 error with no product behind it.

They are the same company now, so the comparison no longer has two sides. Crossbeam acquired Reveal, the combined entity kept the Crossbeam name, and the Reveal platform has been retired. Any article still comparing their account mapping accuracy or ecosystem intelligence side by side is describing a choice that stopped existing.

Reveal was built for exactly that job, but it can no longer do it, because the platform has been decommissioned and folded into Crossbeam. Companies running an ecosystem-led motion who want shared customer and prospect overlap with technology partners now use Crossbeam, PartnerTap, or a partner platform that includes mapping as one stage.

Crossbeam and PartnerTap both integrate with Salesforce, and PartnerTap additionally lists Microsoft Dynamics and HubSpot. The deciding factor is usually not whether Salesforce is supported but what the plan meters. Crossbeam publishes a price and caps seats and record exports. PartnerTap states unlimited users and data on paid editions but publishes no price.

Crossbeam publishes four tiers. Free is $0 forever with no credit card and three full access seats. Connector is $4,800 a year and includes one full access seat, with extra seats at $1,800 per user per year. Supernode and Enterprise are custom, and both list sales seats at $40 per user per month.

PartnerTap publishes no dollar figure. Its pricing page lists four editions, Free, Growth, Scale Up and Hyperscale, and routes each to a sales conversation. It does publish limits rather than prices: paid editions state unlimited users, partners, data and report downloads, while the free edition covers up to five partners and five pipeline shares.

Yes, two. Crossbeam Free is $0 forever with no credit card, three full access seats and unlimited partner connections, though it allows one offline partner, one open data partner and no record exports. PartnerTap also offers a free edition bounded at up to five partners and five pipeline shares with phone and email support.

Crossbeam ran a transition period rather than a hard cutover. Its merger FAQ stated at the time that "In the near term, both products will continue to exist and function as always" and that it would "gradually support transitioning users (and their partners) over time." Confirm your own account state with Crossbeam directly, since the public pages do not detail individual migrations.

Only when overlap is genuinely your bottleneck. Mapping answers which of your customers a partner already sells to, which is valuable once you have enough partners that comparing lists by hand has stopped scaling. If your program has a dozen partners and needs sixty, the constraint is partner supply, and overlap data will not move it.

Start on Crossbeam Free, which costs nothing and gives you three seats and unlimited partner connections, and see how many of your partners are already on the network. If the overlap pool is thin, the paid tier will not fix it. If it is rich, you now know what the $4,800 Connector plan is buying before you spend it.

More comparisons

See how Partnerships compares

vs PartnerStack

PartnerStack alternative

AI finds your partners and drafts outreach, with no marketplace tax.

vs Crossbeam

Crossbeam alternative

Account mapping plus discovery, outreach, onboarding, and tracking in one.

vs impact.com

impact.com alternative

AI prospecting and drafted outreach, fast to start, flat pricing.

vs Impartner

Impartner alternative

PRM lifecycle plus AI prospecting, fast to start, no marketplace tax.

vs Partnerize

Partnerize alternative

AI finds partners and drafts outreach you approve, on flat SaaS.

vs Allbound

Allbound alternative

Allbound is now Channelscaler. Here is how a lighter, AI-first option compares.

vs Kiflo

Kiflo alternative

A Kiflo alternative that finds the partners, and does not price per partner.

vs PartnerTap

PartnerTap alternative

A PartnerTap alternative that finds new partners, not just the overlap with the ones you have.

vs Channeltivity

Channeltivity alternative

A Channeltivity alternative that finds the partners and starts below four figures a month.

vs Introw

Introw alternative

An Introw alternative that finds the partners before it gives them a portal.

vs Partnero

Partnero alternative

A Partnero alternative that recruits the affiliates instead of waiting for them.

vs Everflow

Everflow alternative

An Everflow alternative with published pricing and no six-month lock-in.

vs Tolt

Tolt alternative

A Tolt alternative that recruits affiliates and does not cap your revenue.

vs Rewardful

Rewardful alternative

A Rewardful alternative that recruits the affiliates, not just tracks them.

vs FirstPromoter

FirstPromoter alternative

A FirstPromoter alternative that finds affiliates instead of waiting for them.

vs Magentrix

Magentrix alternative

A Magentrix alternative at a tenth of the price that also finds the partners.

vs ZINFI

ZINFI alternative

A ZINFI alternative that finds the partners, not just manages the ones you have.

vs Tapfiliate

Tapfiliate alternative

A Tapfiliate alternative that recruits the affiliates, not just tracks the ones you have.

vs Zift Solutions

Zift Solutions alternative

A Zift Solutions alternative that finds the partners, not just manages the channel you already run.

vs Affise

Affise alternative

An Affise alternative that finds the partners for you, on flat pricing instead of a performance-network price tag.

vs WorkSpan

WorkSpan alternative

Co-sell tracking and AI partner discovery on published flat pricing, without an enterprise alliance team.

vs Salesforce PRM

Salesforce PRM alternative

Flat pricing that does not climb every time you add a partner, plus AI that finds the partners.

vs Introw and Impartner

Introw vs Impartner

One is free to start and lives inside your CRM. The other is an enterprise suite sold module by module.

vs Impartner and ZINFI

Impartner vs ZINFI

One publishes a full 30-module price list you can read in a minute. The other publishes nothing at all.

vs Impartner and Channeltivity

Impartner vs Channeltivity

Twenty modules against one platform in three tiers. Neither one will show you a price.

vs PartnerStack and Impartner

PartnerStack vs Impartner

One supplies and pays partners. The other manages the ones you already signed. Neither shows a price.

vs Introw and PartnerStack

Introw vs PartnerStack

One publishes every feature limit and no price. The other publishes no limits and no price. Opposite kinds of opacity.

vs Allbound and Channeltivity

Allbound vs Channeltivity

One rebranded and started publishing a $50,000 floor. The other stopped publishing anything at all.

vs PartnerStack and Crossbeam

PartnerStack vs Crossbeam

One runs the partner program. The other tells you which accounts your partners already touch.

vs PartnerStack and impact.com

PartnerStack vs impact.com

Two demo-gated platforms built for two different markets, and the job neither one does.

vs PartnerStack and Rewardful

PartnerStack vs Rewardful

One publishes its prices and only works with Stripe. The other quotes you and runs every partner motion.

vs impact.com and Partnerize

impact.com vs Partnerize

Neither publishes a number. Only one lets you refuse the percentage.

vs Partnero and Rewardful

Partnero vs Rewardful

Both entry plans cost $49. Only one of them has a ceiling written into it.

vs FirstPromoter and Tolt

FirstPromoter vs Tolt

Both meter you on affiliate revenue. Only one of them files your 1099s.

vs FirstPromoter and Dub

FirstPromoter vs Dub

One bills you on the revenue affiliates earn. The other bills you on the money you pay them, and takes 5% of it.

See every use case

Find your partners with Partnerships

Describe your product, get partners ranked by fit, approve the outreach, and track the revenue they drive. Flat pricing, no marketplace tax, your relationships stay yours.

See pricing

Ranked by transparent fit · you approve every outreach · full lifecycle in one place · no marketplace tax